John 17:5 for a Oneness challenge

/ Daniel Mynyk/ No Comments
When a Oneness advocate on a Facebook group asked for trinitarians to explain how Jesus could be truly God, but be distinct from His Father, I replied with an exegesis of John 17:5. This verse clearly distinguishes the Son from the Father in Person but shows that they are coequal and coeternal. Here is my explanation of the verse:
And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was. — John 17:5
“O Father” – This is in the vocative case, grammatically signifying that one person is addressing another person. In the Koine period the vocative case was passing from common use and you see nominatives in many places where a vocative would function, such as when Thomas addresses Jesus with a compound nominative in John 20:28. “glorify me” – This is Jesus, after having addressed the Father with a vocative, issues an imperative to “glorify” (doxason) him. See Isa 42:8 where Yahweh will not give His divine glory to another. If Jesus is Yahweh, this, of course, works. Also, grammatically you have one person addressing another with a vocative and an imperative. Yahweh is one Being Who is three Persons. “with thine own self” (para seautou) – Jesus asks the Father to glorify Him “by the side of” Himself. They, as distinct Persons as the pronouns, cases, and moods indicate, are to be glorified together with the Son “at the side of” the Father. “with the glory which I had with thee” – Again, the two pronouns in this clause (“I” and “thee”) in any expression of language indicates one person speaking to another person. The Son is asking the Father to restore glory (“which I had“). If the Son were an “idealized plan” and not a person when He formerly had this glory, these words would not make sense. “I” once again cannot be anything other than a Person. Idealized plans do not speak! “With thee” (para soi) indicates a conscious and distinct experience. The Son is personally with the Father at this former time, not in His mind! “before the world was” – The Son, then, AS the Son–as a Person–possesed this glory formerly with the Father before creation. This means that the Son is eternal just as the Father is eternal. When the Son is said to have created all things (Joh 1:3; Heb 1:2; Col 1:16; 1Co 8:6), the Son as the Son really did create all things. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as the persons of the One God Yahweh all shared the divine glory in eternity before creation. John 17:5 will always be a thorn in the side of the fantasies of the Oneness position.

Related Posts

A Biblical Perspective on Politics

The 2016 United States Presidental election is indeed an historic election. We could say that every four years is an historic election. Every election becomes more historic, yet more disappointing, fearful, and evil. Christians endure greater pressure that voting is their solemn, moral duty before God. Dread grips their hearts as the moment of truth in November draws ever nearer. The greater good is to choose yesterday’s Satan over today’s greater Satan. Does the Bible offer us a solution to this madness?

The Unbreakable Threefold Cord: A Defense of the Trinity (Part 17)

Having answered all Mr. Burch’s “difficult questions,” we will now turn outside the Scriptures to the understanding of the early church to see how they understood what the Scriptures taught. These were the ones who could read the Scriptures in their original languages and access what the apostles taught outside the inspired writings. By observing the history of the early church, I am in no wise appealing to it as an authority on doctrine. Like Mr. Burch I believe in sola scriptura and tota scriptura, and I stand by my original statement that the Scriptures “ooze and bleed” the doctrine of the Trinity. The Scriptures alone are sufficient to prove their own teachings, and only prooftexts without context resulting in

Read More

The Unbreakable Threefold Cord: A Defense of the Trinity (Part 16)

The Incarnation of the One known as the Son of God will always prove to be a scandal to the world because of the mystery of how God in the person of the Son can be fully divine and fully human at the same time. According to the hypostatic union as expressed in the Chalcedonian Creed, Christ joined a human nature to Himself in the Incarnation, resulting in two natures–divine and human. These two natures are neither divided so as to make Christ two persons as the Nestorians argued, nor are they confounded, confused, and fused so as to obscure His human nature as the Eutychians argued. However, many within Christendom today, usually out of ignorance of the theological battles

Read More

The Unbreakable Threefold Cord: A Defense of the Trinity (Part 15)

In this part we will answer one of Mr. Burch’s remaining “difficult questions” for trinitarians. This question has to do with the distinction in person and role between the Father and the Son. We will see that the Scriptures provide all the answers to this that we need if we let the Spirit lead us into all truth.